|
||||||||||||||
IMPROVING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY Heading into the new year, recent economic data has provided many reasons to be optimistic about the performance of the economy. The US has added an average of nearly 200K jobs over the past three months, and the Unemployment Rate has declined to 7.0%, the lowest level since November 2008. The ISM national manufacturing index held near the highest level since April 2011. Consumer Sentiment jumped to the highest level since July. Finally, Housing Starts were 30% higher than one year ago, at the highest level since February 2008. The Fed’s recent decision to taper its bond purchases reflects its confidence in the sustainability of the economic recovery. Mel Watt is scheduled to be sworn in on January 6 as the new Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The FHFA is the agency that oversees the operations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Since a large percentage of mortgage loans made today are eventually sold to or insured by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Watt will have a very significant influence over mortgage lending. Watt has not made public much of what he will do differently from outgoing Acting Director Edward DeMarco, but his policies are expected to be more accommodating to housing finance. Watt has stated that he will delay the recently announced guarantee fee increases that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had planned to begin charging in March.
WEEK AHEAD |
Posts Tagged ‘Fannie Mae’
January 3, 2014
How the Government Shutdown will Effect Financing
October 2, 2013How the Government Shutdown will Effect Financing
Most Government Sponsored Entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and VA are operating as normal and continue business as usual. FHA is staffed with limited personnel and trying not to delay closings or have their business deterred but I would watch FHA loans and applications very closely(like you weren’t already) to make sure there is no funny business.
The big challenge at the moment for all in the industry is the IRS having its doors closed. On nearly every mortgage loan application borrowers are required to complete the IRS Transcript request form called the 4506-T. This form is sent by the lender to the IRS and they provide the lender with tax transcripts verifying income from tax returns for the previous years requested. This is how the lenders quantify borrowers W-2’s, 1040’s, business income and just about every other possible income from credible tax returns or reported income. The IRS will likely not be processing any 4506-T requests during this shutdown. Depending on the duration of the shutdown, requests may be delayed and there may be a backlog of requests that the IRS will need to process when they do re-open. Additionally the Social Security verifications from the Social Security Administration are not available.
In the meantime, EverBank’s policy for this is if tax returns were prepared by a third party, our Processor and/or Underwriter must independently validate the existence of the third party via an internet search and/or obtain verification of the CPA license. If the returns were prepared by an entity such as H&R Block, the office location should be verified. In general EverBank will not suspend loan closings due to the absence of 4506-T validation, however Underwriters still have the responsibility to conduct proper due diligence of the income documentation provided in loan files. Any red flags need to be addressed as thoroughly as possible without the assistance of the tax return transcripts at this time. Significant red flags in a loan file that cannot be addressed or cleared may warrant postponing a closing until a tax return transcript can be obtained from the IRS.
In general lenders are hopeful mortgage loans will not be delayed and optimistic the shutdown will not last more than a few weeks. Origination companies, correspondent banks, and warehouse lenders may react differently as they access the risks associated with an extended shutdown. If it does last more than a month we may be in for some rocky times on the mortgage side, for now let’s go with business as usual and be mindful when entering contract with an FHA buyer.
Hope this information is helpful and re-assuring.
Thanks, Patrick
Patrick Gardner
Mortgage Loan Officer
Office: 415.423.1424
Cell: 510.599.8499
Fax: 415.477.2146
patrick.gardner@everbank.com
Everbank.com/pgardner
NMLS ID: 378888
California REALTORS® Applaud New Law on Short Sales
July 27, 2011By Leslie Berkman
RISMEDIA, July 26, 2011—(MCT)—Under a new state law, any lender who agrees to a short sale—which by definition will yield insufficient funds to cover the outstanding loans on a property—must accept it as payment in full for all loan balances. That is a good thing for upside-down homeowners who need to sell, says the California Association of REALTORS®.
In a prepared statement applauding Gov. Jerry Brown for signing SB 458 into law, the association observed that previously a first mortgage holder could accept an agreed-upon short sale payment as full payment for the first mortgage but a junior lien holder could still hound the seller for the full amount owned on the junior lien.
“The signing of this bill is a victory for California homeowners who have been forced to short sell their home only to find that the lender will pursue them after the short sale closes, and demand an additional payment to subsidize the difference,” says association President Beth L. Peerce.
“SB 458 brings closure and certainty to the short sale process and ensures that once a lender has agreed to accept a short sale payment on a property, all lien holders—those in first position and in junior positions—will consider the outstanding balance as paid in full and the homeowner will not be held responsible for any additional payments on the property,” she adds.
Those shopping for a home in the $500,000 to $1 million price range should not tarry. That is because they will probably face higher interest rates and more strict underwriting standards and will need to make a larger down payment later this year when conforming loan limits increase, cautions California Association of REALTORS® President Beth L. Peerce.
“Would-be buyers on the fence need to act well before Sept. 30, when the conforming loan limit is set to be lowered, to avoid a higher cost of homeownership,” Peerce said in a prepared statement.
Lowering the limits on mortgages eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could have a broader impact than on individual homebuyers, says Peerce. “As the housing market tries to gain a more solid footing, the decrease in conforming loan limits that is scheduled for later this year could adversely affect the market,” she says.
Copyright (c) 2011, The Press-Enterprise, Riverside, Calif.
What is Really Happening in the Foreclosure / REO Real Estate Process / Market? One Agent’s Point of View
June 23, 2011Is it possible there is a corrupted process at the very top (wall street executives, wall street investors, bank executives, hedge funds, etc.) Here is a thought: We know banks are not willing to reduce the principle loan amount for owners under water. That can easily be measured by the number of completed loan modification that include a principal reduction. Very (very) few: About 49,000 of all the proprietary modifications completed reduced both
the loan principal and monthly interest payments. Out of how many foreclosures again? About 1.2 mil? The ones that are done are merely to keep the politicians at bay so the banks can say they are following their guidelines.
But…….banks are very willing to foreclose on any property, and sell the properties in REO bulk at 55-60% of current market value. This allows rich “investors” to buy these properties, and then turn around and sell them back to the consumers market at 85% of value and make 20-25% of the investment in about 4 months. We are talking about $60 – 100 million REO investment per deal (read “tape”) . You and I cannot take advantage of these incredible returns, as we have no “insider” at the bank who will give us that opportunity. These opportunities go to “connections” so they can make a ton of money on foreclosed properties. Pretty easy money, no? Then here is this question: If banks are willing to write down the REO to 60% of value, then why can they not do a principal forgiveness for say 25% to the home owner? The write off to the bank is the same “loss” no? The big difference is that in the first scenario, the profit goes to the big investors at wall street. In the second scenario the “advantage” goes to the home owners.
So what would be the difference in the real estate market today (read values and prices), if we had used the second scenario? Well for sure there would be a lot less “distressed” properties. The home values would not have declined as much, which also means there would have been much less of a “recession” in real estate, and home owners would have felt very good about staying in their homes, so no strategic defaults, and thus a much “happier” consumer who might have been able to spend money on the economy.
When will we learn to do the right thing for all Americans?
Antoine E. Pirson, MBA, CCRM
Broker and Investment Consultant
Caldecott Properties
5251 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94618
Office: (510) 594 2400 x 234
www.investmentpropertyfirst.com
Fax: (510) 594 2424
Lic Nr: 01372814
Are Banks Hurting Real Estate Values? One Agent’s Opinion is “YES”
May 10, 2011I am sure we all have experience in selling or buying short sales and REO’s. Maybe in your neck of the woods, it is different, but here in California’s Bay Area, it seems that banks are not making the right decisions and are not capable of communicating between departments and are indeed preventing real estate values from stabilizing or appreciating. Here are two examples:
1. I was representing a buyer in short sale, and had an accepted offer from the seller and bank approval. Two before close of escrow, the bank foreclosed, and the property was bought at the county court house steps for $50,000 less than the accepted short sale offer (this is a loss even with the costs of the sale). This is an example of a lender’s inability to communicate between departments. Not only does this not make sense from a business / financial perspective, it also lowers the area prices by $50,000 on equivalent homes.
2. I was representing a buyer in a REO condo purchase. I had an accepted offer from the bank, and was going through the mortgage underwriting. The lender (for the buyer) decides NOT to do the loan, even after appraising the property at value, because the building does not meet a Fannie Mae guideline that was not designed for new construction. The original developer (whose name is on the Final Public Report issued by the California Department of Real Estate) still owns 40% of the total number of units. This resulted in the buyer walking away after spending $400 for appraisal and $400 for inspections. The condo unit sold for $75,000 less than the short sale offer. All the condo owners in this complex were negatively impacted by this sale which may result in these owners “strategically walking away” furthering the challenges faced in the current real estate environment.
You tell me the banks are NOT preventing real estate to rebound?
Antoine E. Pirson, MBA, CCRM, CCIM (candidate)
R.E. Broker and Investment Advisor
Caldecott Properties
5251 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94618
Office: (510) 594 2400 x 234
www.investmentpropertyfirst.com
Fax: (510) 594 2424
Lic Nr: 01372814